Moving Me Down the Highway

By Ryan Gray

The late, great Jim Croce didn't have the federal surface transportation bill in mind when he penned "I've Got a Name" in the 1973. You know the chorus, "Moving me down the highway, rolling me down the highway, moving ahead so life won't pass me by."

Well, the transportation reauthorization process is running into some road blocks. Slated to be passed by Congress by the end of September to replace the current SAFETEA-LU law, the American Public Transportation Association reports on its Web site that there's group of legislators who want an 18-month extension despite strong opposition from James L. Oberstar (D-MN), the chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. He has said that ground transportation in the United States is already suffering from decades of neglect and that a long-term fix to the nation's aging roadways and the insolvent federal highway fund needs to be addressed by the time the current bill expires on Sept. 30.

APTA also opposes the extension. Says Bill Millar, the association's executive director:

“APTA does not want to see multiple short-term extensions as was the case with the SAFETEA-LU process...,” said APTA President William Millar, noting that enactment of a long-term bill is essential for planning and forecasting.

For school transportation, the new transportation bill will address the future of the Federal Safe Routes to School Program, which in part develops better walking and biking routes. A current provision would allow 10 percent of the program's infrastructure funds to be used to create safer school bus stops.

The industry will also be watching what the new bill says about previous FTA rulings that transit agencies must not illegally compete with private school bus operators unless they meet strict requirements. And then there's the issue of the highway fund. School transportation is hoping to retain its federal fuel tax waiver while others aim to increase the tax to pump much needed funds back into coffers.

Social Networking, YouTube and the Feds

Need signs that this is not your father's federal government? Look no further than a new video contest announced yesterday by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius that uses the popular Web site YouTube to disseminate videos espousing on common-sense preventative measures for keeping in check the H1N1 virus.

President Obama utilized social networking to tap in to the 18-35 vote and capture the 2008 election, and the administration has only upped its use of various mediums to connect with the public. Various other politicians, too, have since embraced Twitter and Facebook to demonstrate that they're hip to the game. The latest effort to elicit short videos uploaded via YouTube acts as a mini-stimulus, if you will, as first prize is $2,500. The catch: the video must end with a plug of Flu.gov.

The World Health Organization expects a new strain of H1N1 to pop up this fall as students around the world return to school and mingle their germs. So far, 120 countries and various territories have confirmed nearly 95,000 total cases of the so-called swine flu, resulting in more than 400 deaths. The September magazine issue of School Transportation News will look at how schools battle infectious diseases on the bus and how the H1N1 pandemic is affecting operations.

Obama, Congress Learn About Retreaded Tires

By Ryan Gray

When it comes to the stimulus, there are a host of entities that could stand to benefit. Considering rubber is made from crude petroleum, it's unlikely federal money will be allocated to the tire industry anytime soon. But if the Tire Retread Information Bureau (TRIB) has its way, perhaps the greener side of tires may realize additional positive PR. Today, the organization sent an open letter to President Obama and members of Congress that calls attention to the environmental, cost and safety benefits of retreaded tires.

Federal mandate already requires retreaded tires on certain government vehicles. And many municipalities choose retreads for their fleet vehicles, including school districts. While retreads are only allowed on the rear wheels of school buses, many transportation departments across the nation choose these tires because they are much cheaper than buying new. And they are just as safe with a much smaller carbon footprint.

But retreaded tires have gotten a bad wrap, according to Harvey Brodsky, TRIB's managing director. His organization spends much of each day refuting what it calls bad press, when retreaded tires are blamed for so-called "road alligators," or those bits of tire debris that you see littering highways. But not so, as NHTSA recently found in its December 2008 Commercial Vehicle Tire Debris Study. Brodsky's letter to President Obama and Congress is clearly designed to make all of these points clear.

And if there's another stimulus, as many have forecasted, might the tire retread industry be the latest to get its own slice of the pie?

Time After Time: Public Comment Period on RFS-2 Extended

When Congress passed the Energy Independence Act of 2007, it stipulated that the next round of renewable energy standards would be in place by the start of 2009. Fast forward seven months and lawmakers and the alternative fuel industry is still waiting.

This week, the EPA extended by 60 days the public comment period on RFS-2, from July 27 to Sept. 25. The EPA’s proposal, which was published in the Federal Register on May 26, has been met with some resistance, most notably from the National Biodiesel Board. While RFS-2 sets forth minimum, incremental alt fuel volume requirements from 2009 through 2022, NBB is concerned that the federal government is essentially ignoring soy-based biofuels as one of the most legitimate alternatives currently on the market and focusing its efforts on more pie-in-the-sky options.

It all comes down to money, as the main objective of RFS-2 is to determine tax credits. Sources at the EPA say all RFS-2 does is provide market certainty. The NBB feels it has a lot to lose not only currently if fleets forego the use of biodiesel because the volume requirements are still pending but also in the future if the minimum levels remain far below other alt fuels, as NBB contends. In May, representatives told School Transportation News that RFS-2 made “poor assumptions” about how biodiesel could indirectly affect land usage, as the EPA maintains that soy-based biodiesel has contributed to mass deforestation in South America. The EPA has made it a priority to target alt fuels with the lowest carbon footprint, namely those produced by crops or means that most favorably impact the land itself or the people who live on it. Then there's the argument that biodiesel does little to ween the country off of foreign dependency on oil. A result could be a shake up of the conventional biodiesel industry, with producers foregoing soy beans and finding other means of making the fuel, such as by using algae, biomass or cellulosic ethanol.

Comments may be submitted and viewed at online by searching for Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005.